Throughout my “Uncle Tom…A Traitor – Really???!” post, readers will note asterisks (*) at the end of words and phrases “slave,” “slave trade,” “belong to/owned by” and “master.” Wherever these words and phrases are contained in the sources I quoted, I put my preferred corrections in brackets [ ] next to slavery terminology. The corrections are what I’ve determined are more accurate descriptions of the horrific, terrifying and humiliating experiences of the hundreds of millions of Black men, women and children (my/our ancestors) swept into the abyss of the African holocaust or MAAFA (see Endnote[i]), reported to have began around 650 AD when Arabs invaded and raped Africa (see Endnote [ii]) – over 800 years before European invasion.
“The Arabs and the Europeans were invaders, colonizers and enslavers, who imposed their alien religions on Africa. Neither Islam nor Christianity is indigenous to Africa.” And, “while the Arabs enslaved Africans in the north and east; Europeans enslaved Africans along the Atlantic [West],” Nobel Prize winner/playwright, and author of Of Africa, Wole Soyinka said.
The lexicon of slavery words and phrases have been and are repeated over and over throughout our lives. Slavery language/terminology is one of many examples of “biased ethnocentric euphemism[s] for conquest,” according to a Cambridge University article, Race and Language Teaching. The word “slave,” for example, is in Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.’s “I have a Dream” speech. Each year, new generations of school children repeat these words when they recite the speech while celebrating King’s holiday. “The Texas declaration of secession in 1861 contains the word ‘slave’ 18 times,” stated a character in the satirical comic series, Doonesbury. North Carolina’s Supreme Court defined a “slave” as one who is “…doomed in his own person, and his posterity, to live without knowledge, and without the capacity to make anything his own, and to toil that another may reap the fruits.” This definition remained on the books until 1856. [See: Wheeler's Law of Slavery, 246, State v. Mann.] The word "doomed" speaks volumes.
Slavery terms and phrases that denigrate our African culture and spiritual roots have had and continue to exude profound impact on our identity as a people. The generational sting of these words was made strikingly obvious when I encountered an African American youth who was resistant to learning Black History. His disconnect was so intense, at first, I was baffled. When I inquired: “What’s up?” He declared, “I don’t wanna know nutin’ ‘bout no slaves.”
Thus, began my quest to launch a common-sense, critical thinking discussion on slavery language and its impact on our identity.
The implication that African people were "slaves" populates mass media and literature. Even when information is provided about a real person, like Nancy Green, who was photographed for the Antebellum "Aunt Jemima" image seen on the pancake mix box for nearly six decades, the writer states that Green was "born a slave." Nonsense. She was born into a slavery environment and held hostage. It would be outrages to say to a newborn baby: “You are a slave.” (In June 2021, amidst heightened racial unrest, after the murder of George Floyd and numerous African American men and women by police in the United States, the Aunt Jemima brand name was discontinued by its current owner, PepsiCo.)
The point of our discussion was to help the youths understand that being born into a slavery situation makes a person(s) no more a slave – genetically/organically - than a person(s) born into a poverty situation makes that person – genetically/organically - poor. Would you look at a newborn baby and say: “You are poor?”
I encouraged the youths to call on the phenomenal strength of their Ancestors to focus on the person(s)/individual(s) beyond the condition or situation, just as youths are encouraged to focus on themselves as a person and not the poverty and/or violence that may surround them in their community.
Words carry vibrations/frequencies. Just compare the difference in vibrations when we speak the words hate and love. We also feel the contrasting vibrations between the words “slave” and “hostage.” Saying our Ancestors were "hostages" motivates us to mentally and emotionally punish the enslaver instead of the victim.
Everyone, especially teens and young adults, act in harmony with our perception of ourselves or perception of others. Again, if, unconsciously, teens/young adults, males and females perceive themselves as “nothing” vis–à–vis being “descendants of slaves” and, again, “slaves” being perceived as being nothing/valueless, then, through this internalized self-hate, it’s easy to commit senseless violence against anyone in their race; conversely, committing violence against themselves. (See Dr. Joy Degruy’s example of behavior reflective of Post Traumatic Slave Syndrome/PTSS.)
There is a “link between languages and domination” Bell Hooks enlightened us in her essay, Hooks on the Language of Power. She adds “…it is not the English language that hurts me, but what the oppressors do with it, how they shape it to become a territory that limits and defines; how they make it a weapon that can shame, humiliate, colonize…,” such as the n-word. So, the youths and I agreed to replace the word "slave" with "hostage."
The population at which word-weapons is targeted, unconsciously/subconsciously, latch on to the definition of experiences that give colossal pain, especially when that population has been savagely torn from their home and family, and stripped of their original heritage/identity – name, language, religion/ritual practices and meanings, and specific geographical place of origin - as were our African ancestors. Slavery language provokes and evokes in African people throughout the Diaspora a cacophony of losses. “We have not even dealt with slavery. We are walking around still traumatized,” actress, Taraji P. Henson, said in an Essence Magazine interview on the subject of mental health and the African American community.
Africans throughout the Diaspora is the ONLY race of people (some scholars say 300 million) FORCIBLY stripped of their identity (name, language, etc.) under the threat of bloody bodily harm, as shown in the vicious "whipping" scene in Roots, the 1977 TV mini-series, where kidnapped Kunta Kinte is forced to call himself "Toby." (It’s interesting to note that it was during the late 1960s that African Americans began naming their children with non-European-sounding names, such as Kanisha, Kadisah, Jamaal, Kalil, Akil, Imani, Jada, and so on.)
Consequently and erroneously, the young man and millions of Black youths (as well as adults) feel their African ancestry is based solely on this noun. For many, saying our Ancestors were "slaves" suggests an organic, innate, inborn, genetic/character flaw, inferring that enslavement is the victim’s fault; consequently, stigmatizing a terrorized, unwilling victim.
The word evokes a psychological distancing that makes it easier to dehumanize the victims. It also evokes grief. Grief and love, it is believed, resides in the heart. The tentacles of that dehumanization, that stigma, have burrowed into the minds and hearts of tens of millions of Black and non-Black people, around the globe. In JASON PARHAM's in-depth essay, Tiktok and the Evolution of Digital Blackface, on the popular platform's racism, one of the white users responded to complaints of appropriating African Americans' creativity: “Y'all don't even realize, if it wasn't for a certain amount of white people, y'all would still be slaves.” Here’s incontrovertible evidence of the demeaning “slave” connotation that displaces a people’s humanity.
Religion was among the tactics for much of that “shaping,” Wole Soyinka declared in his book, Of Africa. “The chains placed around the mind through religious absolutism are far more constrictive, tenacious, and implacable, than corrupt, secular dictatorships," he wrote. Consequently, the “slave” mentality is formed, especially since the Bible and other “sacred” books contain pro-slavery language, such as in Colossians 3:22-24. On the other hand, African hostages, who didn't succumb to and embrace a “slave mentality,” experienced the conundrum of not wanting to abandon what was familiar,
Interestingly, I learned about White-on-White and Islamic slavery in high school in the early 1960s (despite cutting history classes because nothing in the textbooks reflected my race in a positive light). For the most part, this information has since been deleted from today’s American schools’ world history curriculum.
The English word “slave” is rooted in the European word “slav,” from the Slavics, one of a group of peoples in eastern, southeastern, and central Europe, including the Russians and Ruthenians (Eastern Slavs); the Bulgars, Serbs, Croats, Slavonians, Slovenes (Southern Slavs), the Poles, Czechs, Moravians, and Slovaks (see Western Slavs). But the word existed in other languages among diverse groups in Africa long before Arabs and Europeans invaded, pillaged and colonized the Continent. For example, the word for slavery is ẹrú in Yoruba (Nigeria). The coastal country hosts 371 ethnic groups, among which there are 525 languages).
That said, white-controlled education, literature and mass media are careful to never call their ancestors “slaves” or say “white people came from slaves.” Neither do Asians and East Indians. Yet, these groups also have a long history of their ancestors being enslaved by their own and by others. Still, they do not broadcast, “we are descendants of slaves,” to each other and the world.
[1] Being on the “front lines,” so to speak, Ms. Wells’ “10,000 lynchings” assessment may be more accurate than current reports that range from 4,743 between Reconstruction and 1968, and 4,400 lynchings during the period between Reconstruction and World War II and 6,500 (to date) according to the Equal Justice Initiative. Ms. Wells’s rise from schoolteacher to a powerful civil rights activist is artfully weaved into Alex Tresniowski’s historical suspense novel, The Rope: A True Story of Murder, Heroism, and the Dawn of the NAACP (https://www.goodreads. com/en/book/show/54304237_. In 2020, ninety years late, Ms. Wells-Barnett was awarded a Pulitzer Prize.
[2]As a spectator sport, “lynching coordinators” distributed leaflets that shouted: WHITE FOLKS INVITED TO A HANGING BEE! Source: Guardian.com (https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/apr/26/lynchings-memorial-us-south-montgomery-alabama).
The “already slaves” narrative was most certainly in the minds of the White mob that committed unspeakable savagery on eight-month pregnant Mary Turner. She had protested her husband’s lynching. They hung her upside, thuggishly sliced open her belly and when her fetus tumble to the ground, the savages crushed the unborn with the heels of their boots.
Who knows who first thought it okay to kidnap and enslave people, much less see humans as property. But one fact is true, any kidnapped individual is an unwilling participant! A kidnapped individual, held against his or her will, and brutalized, is a HOSTAGE!
“Africans enslaved Africans then sold their [so-called] slaves to Europeans” is another perpetual and misleading narrative in media, textbooks, and literature. Conveniently omitted from the “Africans sold Africans” indictment is that NOT ALL African Kings/Queens/Rulers/warriors were complicit in this MAAFA (holocaust). Award winning historian, Sylviane A. Diouf anthologized this purposely hidden fact in her revealing book, Fighting the Slave Trade: West African Strategies. The following partial list of Diouf ’s Table of Contents shows that more Africans fought against Arabian/European/American enslavement of their people than those who were complicit:
in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Century Upper Guinea Coast, by
Ismail Rashid.
Slave Raiders in Coastal Guinea-Bissau, 1450-1815, by Walter
Hawthorne.
SLAVERY: DIFFERENT SYSTEMS
- for punishment for a crime,
- payment for a debt, or as
- prisoners of war.
Control of African male hostages in the Islamic and Ottoman Empires included castration;called "eunuchs." Eunuchs "would usually be [so-called]slaves that had been castrated so they would be reliable servants of a royal court." Pictures of a Eunuchs show them dressed in what looks like fine attire; a deception to disguise the de-humanizing horror the boys and men had experienced. In the Ottoman Empire, "eunuchs were typically [so-called]slaves imported from outside their domains." The brutal, bloody act was also practiced throughout Asia (including China) and the Middle East (including Saudia Arabia). As noted on the SecularAfrican blog -
Eunuchs and Ghilman in The Islamic Empire,
White enslavers in America also castrated the men they enslaved. David Hackett Fischer documented this, yet another more barbaric act against Black people, in AFRICAN FOUNDERS – How Enslaved People Expanded American Freedom. Hackett wrote that, in Virginia, a trafficking hub at the time, castration was ordered by the Middlesex County Court for a broad range of offenses. He tells readers that enslaver, Christopher Robinson, castrated “George” for running away. Enslaver, John Parke Custis committed the same savage act on “Peter.” While White men could, and did, rape Black girls and women with impunity, many times viciously so, a Black man, if not killed, was castrated for raping a White woman, even if the White woman initiated and/or consented to the act. In 1730, a Virginia law mandated that, “if caught alive,” castration was the punishment.
The Phrase “slave trade"
The Phrases “belong to" and owned by" This demoralizing phrase is seen and heard throughout all textbooks, literature and media. In a 2015 exhibit, that featured portraits of known and unknown musicians, at Washington, DC’s National Portrait Gallery, the written description under a lithograph of the musical savant and genius, Thomas Greene Wiggins, reminded visitors that he was “owned by” Colonel James Bethune, for whom he “made a fortune.”
Standing before the exhibit and reading that this man was “owned by” an enslaver, sent a mix message of overt pride (he was a genius) and covert embarrassment (he was “owned by”) through the African American onlookers, including me. One lady commented to a friend: “I hate that ‘owned by’ comment. It disgusts me!”
Greene (a.k.a. “Blind Tom”), the first African American to perform at the White House in 1860, sang in multiple languages, composed more than 100 piano and vocal compositions, including Oliver Galop and Virginia Polka, published in 1860. In an astonishingly unusual occurrence during slavery, he earned, for the enslaver, $50,000 annually in concert tours. (See Endnote [v])
In the case where Native Americans enslaved Africans, and only a few are known to indulge in this inhumane practice, we rarely read or hear descendants of those enslaved Africans carrying Native American enslavers’ surnames. (See: 5 Native American Communities Who [that] Enslaved Africans)
Furthermore, I've never heard or read where whites are tagged with the “owned by” label, despite the fact, as addressed earlier, whites enslaved and sold other whites, as did the Arabs/ Moors/Muslims. This tragic term is also unheard of in Asian slavery descriptions.
Never having to be burdened with being identified as being "owned" by anyone, may be why Ethiopians have a rarefied sense of pride. Ethiopia is the only country in Africa that was never "conquered" by Arabians nor Europeans; its people never were colonized/enslaved or "owned."
as another “biased ethnocentric euphemism for conquest,” infers supremacy in general and white supremacy, in particular, when framed within the context of the enslavement of Africans. Kidnappers/enslavers - Black, White, Arabian or Asian - are not “masters!” A person may be a master of a skill or craft, but is not master of a person, despite the plethora of secular and religious literature that emphatically sanction this falsehood.
These now invisible “chains” have placed Africans throughout the Diaspora between an emotional rock and a hard place. “There is a great existential difficulty in attempting to count oneself a human being equal with all others after having suffered through the experience of centuries of slavery. It is the trauma of slavery that haunts African Americans in the deepest recesses of our souls. Indeed, its suppression and denial only hurt us more deeply by causing us to accept a limiting, disparaging, and at times even repugnant view of ourselves,” wrote Jan Willis, the author of Dreaming Me.
Changing slavery terminology (vibration/frequency) can change our mindset, a fact white decision makers understood when they stopped broadcasting (if they ever did) “white people were slaves” to saying they were “indentured servants." A change or upgrade in slavery terminology can aid us in breaking the chains of psychological and emotional chains of slavery.
Motivational speakers understand the power of word vibrations, which is why they tell audiences to say “when” something they desire will happen, not “if.” The vibrations, frequency/energy from “when” is more definitive, positive/active-focused than the vibrations/energy from the passive/inactive word “if.”
Changing slavery language changes vibrations - hence, our mindset - thus raising youths’ interest in initiating a desire for clarity about and engagement in Black African History.
Changing slavery language also makes a stronger case for reparations. Since kidnapped African people were not “already slaves” and weren’t “owned” by anyone, but were hostages, their descendants deserve reparations. (The D.C. Compensation Emancipation Act, not surprisingly, compensated the enslavers with $300 per hostage.)
One youth, who grasped the spirit of the discussion, concluded: “So, Abraham Lincoln didn’t free ‘slaves.’ The Proclamation Emancipation just gave African hostages the right to escape slavery without being kidnapped again.” Bingo!
The Other African Diaspora: Islam's Black Slaves [Hostages]
Slavery in the Ottoman Empire. The Ottoman Empire was a multinational, multilingual empire controlling much of Southeast Europe, parts of Central Europe, Western Asia, the Caucasus, North Africa, and the Horn of Africa.[13]
Aboriginal children imprisoned at high rates. Washington Post. 2016
Before the Mayflower - A History of Black America, by Lerone Bennett, Jr, former editor and writer for Ebony Magazine.
They Came Before Columbus - The African Presence in Ancient America, by Dr. Ivan Van Sertima
No comments:
Post a Comment